Re:Mozilla may treat Aussie staff as 'insider threats' to co...
by x0x0 on Monday February 25, 2019 @04:36AM
(#19244297)
it means if the PR was submitted by an Aussie (or resident) you better make sure your code review has a non-Aussie on it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Mozilla may treat Aussie staff as 'insider threats' to co...
by rovyko on Monday February 25, 2019 @06:37AM
(#19244868)
Do you think the presence of a code review practices alone will be enough of a deterrent against agencies using devs for this purpose?
Even if you pressure someone to make a backdoor and they get caught, you've just exposed your intentions when it could have been easier to go straight to the company.
Re:Mozilla may treat Aussie staff as 'insider threats' to co...
by mikerg87 on Monday February 25, 2019 @10:34AM
(#19246320)
I don’t think A PR is the only attack vector. I would be suspect of the entire CI/CD pipeline and any production systems or distribution systems in employed
Re:Mozilla may treat Aussie staff as 'insider threats' to co...
by MrEldritch on Monday February 25, 2019 @12:07PM
(#19247148)
Also, if I were an Aussie and I'd gotten a request like this, I'd feel pretty incentivized to make the backdoor as blatant and suspicious-looking as possible. The government ordered you to do it; it did not order you to do a good job.
So "evil PR" would probably be the easiest thing to catch, and it definitely seems like other compromise vectors are where the real danger is.
Re:Mozilla may treat Aussie staff as 'insider threats' to co...
by noir_lord on Monday February 25, 2019 @12:18PM
(#19247292)
public function rot13_GbgnyylAbgNOnpxqbbe()
Something subtle like that?Fwiw the UK has near identical legislation and I'm pretty sure the Aussie gov looked at ours first.
We lead the world in subtly corrupting democracy.