News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon cargo plane crashes in Texas by Symbiote on Sunday February 24, 2019 @04:18PM (#19240668)
A British bus will be refuelled in litres, which I think was the point.

> as though you can just stop selling letter paper and force everyone to use A-series compatible envelopes, and convert the clean (if baroque) markings on the paper products to bizarre decimal fractions of a g/m² without any empathy for the old guard.

The first part was done in Britain in the 1950s, but with the weights rounded to convenient metric numbers.

Re:Amazon cargo plane crashes in Texas by stordoff on Sunday February 24, 2019 @06:22PM (#19241316)
> A British bus will be refuelled in litres, which I think was the point.

Refuelled in litres, but with efficiency measured in miles per gallon. It's kind of a mess.

Re:Amazon cargo plane crashes in Texas by Symbiote on Monday February 25, 2019 @05:13PM (#19249972)
That's the case for cars, but I wouldn't be certain it's the same for buses, especially large fleets of public transport buses.

All three British bus manufactures give all measurements except speed in metric, although none give an actual fuel consumption. (Just "20% better" etc.)

[1], as the first reference I can find, uses both l/100km and mpg.

[1] https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/fuel_consumption_of_p...

Re:Amazon cargo plane crashes in Texas by bostonpete on Sunday February 24, 2019 @09:06PM (#19242200)
Miles per US gallon or miles per imperial gallon?
Re:Amazon cargo plane crashes in Texas by magduf on Monday February 25, 2019 @12:44PM (#19247563)
The latter, miles per UK gallon. Watch out for that, because if you don't know better, you'll read about some car in the UK and wonder why it has such astounding fuel economy!