News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments by rayiner on Sunday February 24, 2019 @01:27PM (#19239805)
No agency would be on firm footing pointing to a large number of identical form comments received for one side as a factor in a balancing of interests. It would not survive the “reasoned decision making” requirement. To the extent you’re talking about balancing the needs of small and large companies, for example, you’d have to point to concrete examples and data. That could come in comments (small businesses talking about real challenges they’ve faced), but relying on a large number of identical form comments wouldn’t pass muster.
Re:Prominent D.C. media firm implicated in fake FCC comments by acdha on Sunday February 24, 2019 @03:15PM (#19240358)
If you assume good faith, yes. In the environment they were in where they knew that oversight was in friendly hands, however, I think they were just looking for enough to say the process was followed knowing that it’d be done before it’d get any critical examination.