News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Python: Even a Feature That You Do Not Use Can Bite You by masklinn on Saturday February 23, 2019 @11:01AM (#19233873)
> Despite considerable discussion about a standard type parameterisation syntax, it was decided that this should also be left to third-party libraries. ([7], [8], [9]).

> Despite yet more discussion, it was decided not to standardize a mechanism for annotation interoperability. Standardizing interoperability conventions at this point would be premature. We would rather let these conventions develop organically, based on real-world usage and necessity, than try to force all users into some contrived scheme. ([14], [15], [16]).

Re:Python: Even a Feature That You Do Not Use Can Bite You by Pxtl on Saturday February 23, 2019 @01:02PM (#19234560)
That doesn't sound really "batteries included" to me.
Re:Python: Even a Feature That You Do Not Use Can Bite You by painful on Saturday February 23, 2019 @01:14PM (#19234624)
Is there a single programming language for which static analyzers are a part of the language rather than external tools?