News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Build Your Own ‘Medicare for All’ Plan. Beware: There Are... by jawns on Friday February 22, 2019 @11:43AM (#19226725)
The fifth choice presented in this Upshot piece is whether there should be some form of cost sharing in a universal health care system.

The argument against cost sharing is that it penalizes the poor, who are likely to put off treatment if they can't afford it.

The argument in favor of cost sharing is that it helps prevent people from taking advantage of the system.

I wonder if it might be possible to strike a balance using graduated (rather than fixed) cost sharing based on income.

So, let's say the cost sharing for a monthly prescription is normally $30.

But someone with an AGI below $50K might pay $20, and someone with an AGI below $30K might pay $10, and someone with an AGI below $10K might pay $5.

You would always have to pay something (because, as NYU's Glied points out, "the biggest effects are moving from zero to something"). But that something would be proportionate to your means.

Re:Build Your Own ‘Medicare for All’ Plan. Beware: There Are... by zeroonetwothree on Friday February 22, 2019 @12:03PM (#19226896)
The could be good in theory but it seems like a nightmare to implement. At the time you pay you don't actually know your income for the year so how would it work exactly? You guess and then get it adjusted at tax time (would everyone then just put $0?)
Re:Build Your Own ‘Medicare for All’ Plan. Beware: There Are... by nybble41 on Friday February 22, 2019 @04:05PM (#19229104)
You could just use average income over the previous 3-5 years rather than the current tax year income. The IRS already has that data on file.
Re:Build Your Own ‘Medicare for All’ Plan. Beware: There Are... by occamrazor on Friday February 22, 2019 @12:27PM (#19227132)
Two possible solutions relatively easy to implement:

1. Use previous year income.

2. Everybody pays the maximum copay and then gets some money back with their taxes.

Re:Build Your Own ‘Medicare for All’ Plan. Beware: There Are... by basch on Friday February 22, 2019 @12:02PM (#19226887)
>a monthly prescription

Fund drug research through public-private hybrids and grants, instead of intellectual property monopolies for the first x years of the drug. You can then spread the cost of developing the drug over a generation or two, instead of making the first people to be treated foot the entire bill. The public will own the intellectual property, the government can decide what diseases to fund/fight, and private companies still have incentive to perform research. All the while, private research can still compete for other treatments, or rare diseases with funding.