Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by bradleyjg on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @09:03PM
(#19213922)
The US Supreme Court decided many decades ago that the Bill of Rights doesn’t apply wholesale to the states. Instead they held that each right has to be analyzed separately to determine if it should apply to the states. This principle is called “selective incorporation”.
At this point most of the rights have been incorporated and only a few have specifically not been incorporated, most notably the right to a grand jury indictment. The excessive fines clause was one of the stragglers that hadn’t been decided either way. (The third amendment probably never will be decided.)
Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by burlesona on Thursday February 21, 2019 @01:23AM
(#19214959)
Actually the third amendment has already been decided as incorporated. :)
Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by bradleyjg on Thursday February 21, 2019 @08:08AM
(#19216575)
Only in the 2nd circuit, I guess, but good call.
Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by intopieces on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @08:55PM
(#19213886)
State Supreme Courts can't incorporate parts of the constitution against their own laws, this is the role of SCOTUS. It's not a matter of will or desire; it's a matter of jurisprudence.
I read the official decision from the state court[0] but it's a bit dense for me to get through. It seems like a legal punt, of sorts, in the hopes that SCOTUS would pick up the case.
I'd love to hear someone more qualified break down the state decision.
[0] https://www.leagle.com/decision/ininco20171102267