Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by TremendousJudge on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @03:29PM
(#19211645)
Unrelated question, but who is paying for all these lawyers? Timbs himself out of his pocket?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by da_chicken on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @03:39PM
(#19211747)
Wikipedia says he was represented by the Institute for Justice.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timbs_v._Indiana
Otherwise, yes, Timbs would have to pay. You can file a petition to ask the court to waive your court costs (there's a Latin legal term for it that I believe means "with pockets turned out" or "with pockets empty" but I can't remember it), but your lawyer's time isn't covered by that.
Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by umanwizard on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @03:58PM
(#19211899)
I think in forma pauperis is the phrase you're looking for (but its literal meaning isn't what you suggest).
Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by da_chicken on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @04:06PM
(#19211980)
That is it, yes.
Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by thaumasiotes on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @05:15PM
(#19212595)
For reference, in forma pauperis means "in the shape of a poor man"; pockets aren't mentioned. As far as I'm aware, the Romans didn't have pockets and so there would be no way to express the concept in Latin.
Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by umanwizard on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @05:32PM
(#19212749)
Latin was the international language of Europe for almost a thousand years after the collapse of the Roman Empire, during which time many scientific advancements were made. There are plenty of Latin words for things that didn't exist in Antiquity.
Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by thaumasiotes on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @05:51PM
(#19212902)
There are tiny communities who use recreational Latin today. Here's the Vicipaedia article on the telephonum: https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephonum
But that doesn't really constitute a good argument that there is a Latin word for telephones.
Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by _emacsomancer_ on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @09:55PM
(#19214137)
Given that telephone is Ancient Greek (though obviously coined more recently), I don't see why there shouldn't be a Latin word for it.
Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by marktangotango on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @07:59PM
(#19213593)
Thank you, beautiful refutation of an argumentative quarralous, I would even say bad faith, assertion, which we see entirely to often now imo.
Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by Pharmakon on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @08:05PM
(#19213625)
I had no idea this existed, and you just made my day with it.
Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by dclowd9901 on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @06:10PM
(#19213051)
> As far as I'm aware, the Romans didn't have pockets and so there would be no way to express the concept in Latin.
I know this is probably not meant to be funny, but for whatever reason, in reading it, I couldn't help but laugh.
Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by TheGRS on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @07:47PM
(#19213532)
Others have more specific answers, but more broadly if you have a case that's Supreme Court worthy there are numerous organizations willing to step in to represent your side. The ACLU is sort of built on this principle.
Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by raincom on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @03:29PM
(#19211656)
pro bono. I think IJR is involved in this:
https://ij.org/report/policing-for-profit/
Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by jessriedel on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @07:32PM
(#19213450)
More generally, I believe that by the time a cases nears the level of the Supreme Court, legal fees typically become less of an issue in practice. There are many orgs on bath sidee that fund cases with important precedent, and plenty of great lawyers willing to argue for free since it's so prestigious.
Re:U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize P...
by BurningFrog on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @11:17PM
(#19214497)
Institute for Justice: https://ij.org/about-us/
You can help out too: https://ij.org/support/give-now