And you're a liar refusing to provide me with an actual proper citation or resource. If these are easily verifiable facts, then I would expect you could find me a reputable climatologist that debunks the claims made. Neither of us are climatologists and can make claims as to whether or not someone nitpicking an incredibly tiny portion of a paper (which has more data corroborating the growth in temperature) invalidates the whole thing.

I have long learned not to trust climate skeptics to debate in good faith. So please, provide a proper source.

If the people who operate the weather station explicitly saying that its data should not be used for long term interpretation isn't credible enough for you, frankly I don't know what would be.

Once again, I am not a 'climate skeptic'. You need to dial down your irrational hatred.