Re:As McKinsey Sells Advice, Its Hedge Fund May Have a Stake...
by tomp on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @04:59PM
(#19203269)
Why do you think that would be more likely in a structure like McKinsey's than in other structures? E.g. many banks have such structures (e.g. trading and M&A have a "firewall" between them so that no information crosses), and obviously insider trading/market manipulation happens between companies with no (or very little) legal connections (e.g. LIBOR scandal, or most other insider trading).
Re:As McKinsey Sells Advice, Its Hedge Fund May Have a Stake...
by Nicholas_C on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @08:39PM
(#19204839)
In the short time I worked for a bank during an internship it was very apparent that there is training one goes through regarding this sort of thing and a very formalized processes with strong rules about how you can even contact the other side of the house. I doubt McKinsey has this structure.
This is a pretty softball take by Matt Levine.
Re:As McKinsey Sells Advice, Its Hedge Fund May Have a Stake...
by nebolo on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @12:01AM
(#19205642)
Of course McKinsey has this structure. Indeed Puerto Rico recently investigated this structure and found it up to the task: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/about%20us/media%2...
Re:As McKinsey Sells Advice, Its Hedge Fund May Have a Stake...
by the_watcher on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @09:33PM
(#19205089)
Why would you assume that McKinsey doesn't also have a Chinese wall with training that MIO employees have to go through?
Re:As McKinsey Sells Advice, Its Hedge Fund May Have a Stake...
by Nicholas_C on Monday February 25, 2019 @04:45PM
(#19249761)
I would assume that since McKinsey is a consulting firm primarily they don’t have to comply with the same regulations that a bank does.
Re:As McKinsey Sells Advice, Its Hedge Fund May Have a Stake...
by akozak on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @02:07PM
(#19201788)
Insider trading would be bad and illegal. But absent evidence that it's happening, I think his point is that merely having a stake by holding securities isn't inherently problematic.
Re:As McKinsey Sells Advice, Its Hedge Fund May Have a Stake...
by casefields on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @08:24PM
(#19204768)
The biggest risk if they were doing it is if anyone whistle blows on them that person can get a fat reward: https://www.sec.gov/whistleblower
Re:As McKinsey Sells Advice, Its Hedge Fund May Have a Stake...
by lordnacho on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @03:16PM
(#19202364)
Well then McKinsey should just say which firms they have positions in, and everyone can be satisfied that there's no problem?
Re:As McKinsey Sells Advice, Its Hedge Fund May Have a Stake...
by solveit on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @07:03PM
(#19204316)
McKinsey should do nothing because responding to a non-story is terrible PR.
Re:As McKinsey Sells Advice, Its Hedge Fund May Have a Stake...
by diminoten on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @08:28PM
(#19204789)
Because they're signing a bunch of document saying they're not going to do exactly this, so if they are doing exactly this, well... with their own petards they shall be hoistened, and that's a given.
The problems would be:
1) McKinsey learns about non-public good things on the inside, and so buys even more stock than they otherwise would (pretty much the definition of insider trading) and/or sells competitors' stock
2) McKinsey learns about non-public bad things on the inside, and so sells stock they otherwise would have held and/or buys competitors' stock
I don't see how Matt Levine can possibly just brush that aside?