Re:Four-day week trial: study finds lower stress but no cut ...
by nick_g on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @10:32AM
(#19199592)
I would expect that paying people for unused vacation would incentivize employees overworking themselves leading to reduced quality of output. In a sense, I expect that it would magnify the existing issues with unlimited PTO. It seems like this would be neither good for employee or employer.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Four-day week trial: study finds lower stress but no cut ...
by acomjean on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @10:53AM
(#19199755)
Most companies only let you bank so many pto (Paid Time Off) hours and carry them over year to year. I think this came about because of accounting change where employee hours are considered a liability (Hours/Money owed for nothing in return), but I might be wrong on that.
As a result employees can't just bank their vacation hours and get a big payday when they leave. It tends to only take a couple years to get up to the max, and you end up with "use it or loose it" pto.
Re:Four-day week trial: study finds lower stress but no cut ...
by ghaff on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @05:17PM
(#19203434)
It's been accounting rules for a very long time. It's pretty much Accounting 101. If you accrue liabilities that you're obligated to provide (either in the form of employee time off or pay-out upon departure), that's a textbook liability.
Which is why employers almost always cap in some form or another; the exact mechanism is partially determined by state law.
I worked for a company once that, during a bad spell, eliminated an accrual cap to encourage people to bank vacation. The result was that a not small number of people who weren't really into taking vacation just let their balances balloon. The company eventually forced people to work down their balances.
Re:Four-day week trial: study finds lower stress but no cut ...
by NullPrefix on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @12:22PM
(#19200735)
>Hours/Money owed for nothing in return
From the business perspectice services rendered previously is "nothing", because you can't get any more value from that
Re:Four-day week trial: study finds lower stress but no cut ...
by miranda_rights on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @02:04PM
(#19201770)
People are technically already paid for their unused PTO when they leave a company with an allocated PTO/year (although this may vary between states). That was one of the reasons why I chose my current company, because I figured I'd make a little 'extra' money leaving after a year without taking any PTO. Personally, I did end up feeling a little burned out so I opted to actually start using my PTO, but it's nice to have the freedom either way.