yeah, tell that to Venezuelans.
> You completely fail to address the point - when making a transaction, removing the bank from the picture actually hurts purchasers and demands far more trust.
that wasn't actually the point, or at least was completely off target, but sure, i can address it - banks are providing some useful services, banks won't stop providing those services on top of cryptocurrencies, they will just have to face the reality that nobody is going to inflate them out of their financial screw ups.
and finally, if you're fine trusting politicians to run your financial system and regularly screw you up with inflation, financial meltdowns, bankruptcies, etc - i'm ok with your choice. just get off your high horse and don't claim nothing should be attempted to fix that by and for people who are fed up.
Or BTC hodlers who've seen an 80% crash, perhaps.
> banks are providing some useful services, banks won't stop providing those services on top of cryptocurrencies
Then they, and I, have no incentive to use cryptocurrency.
>finally, if you're fine trusting politicians to run your financial system and regularly screw you up with inflation, financial meltdowns, bankruptcies, etc
So far the current sytems in western democracies have outperformed any other system, ever. Further, having a centrally controlled currency is a good thing, yes, it allows monetary supply to be altered and manipulated to support the economy. Unlike, say, gold, which turned out to be a bad choice for a currency.
I'd far rather have monetary policy set by a government, or a quasi-independent entity like the Bank of England, than by some geeks and a bunch of miners.
> claim nothing should be attempted to fix ...
Your 'fix' doesn't actually fix anything and it makes a lot of things worse. That's why you get called on it.
zoom out, you're embarrassing yourself.
> Your 'fix' doesn't actually fix anything and it makes a lot of things worse. That's why you get called on it.
that's just like your opinion man. no reason to continue, time will prove who's right.
Don't care.
> all you have is trust that the bank will provide you $100 when you ask for it.
Yup, turns out this trust is pretty good, it's backed up by all sorts of regulations and insurance, all sorts of protections and security, and in the last resort by the state.
> when you have 100BTC, you actually have 100BTC.
Who cares? When I have $100 in my wallet, I actually have $100.
You completely fail to address the point - when making a transaction, removing the bank from the picture actually hurts purchasers and demands far more trust.