News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:China Unveils Plan to Tie Hong Kong, Macau Closer to Main... by smcl on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @06:53AM (#19198290)
The US and the British Empire in first half of the 20th century (until the dissolution of the empire) might be an example
Re:China Unveils Plan to Tie Hong Kong, Macau Closer to Main... by arethuza on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @07:42AM (#19198519)
Well, the US Army did regard the UK as a potential enemy before WW2:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Plan_Red

Re:China Unveils Plan to Tie Hong Kong, Macau Closer to Main... by TallGuyShort on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @09:14AM (#19199020)
Even then, they had pretty detailed plans worked out for many, many scenarios. It doesn't mean they weren't co-existing well or that anyone thought it was likely. Making a plan is so inexpensive compared to the cost of responding to some event without a well-laid-plan, that having a plan is hardly what I would call regarding them as a potential enemy.
Re:China Unveils Plan to Tie Hong Kong, Macau Closer to Main... by vkou on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @01:36PM (#19201497)
That's because the US (by this point) indisputably claimed one third of the world (The Monroe doctrine), whereas the UK was at the time more focused on being on the winning side of the European alliance system, then on making claims on American colonies. (Because it was afraid of an ascendant Germany. Fear of Germany was also the biggest driver for entering into an alliance with France.)

In the inter-war years, the UK was no longer concerned with Germany, but, due to the Great Depression, was also too damn broke to go on international adventures. The same situation played out in the US.

The only reason the two powers are now aligned, is because the United States started seeing communism, as opposed to European colonialism[1] as its biggest threat.

The moral of this story is that superpowers can have friendly relationships when they have a common enemy, or no conflicting goals.

An obvious question, here is - what are the conflicting goals of China, and the United States? The answer is - influence among China's neighbours. If the US was not interested in maintaining it, there would be no conflict.

[1] In the 19th century, European colonialism was a threat to American colonialism. In the 20th century, the American empire has resisted de-colonization a lot better then European powers did.

Re:China Unveils Plan to Tie Hong Kong, Macau Closer to Main... by mobilefriendly on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @02:30PM (#19201962)
You misunderstand the Monroe Doctrine. It was a policy of anti-colonialism in Latin America, supporting independent states free from European rule.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monroe_Doctrine

Re:China Unveils Plan to Tie Hong Kong, Macau Closer to Main... by vkou on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @03:44PM (#19202594)
You misunderstand the implementation of the Monroe Doctrine.

The optics of it were anti-colonial. The implementation of it was absolutely colonial. This is one of the many baffling contradictions of America.

Central and South American states were only allowed to be independent of European rule. They were, and continue to, be client states of Washington. When they forget this, they get regime-changed.

America's 19th and 20th century adventures in Hawaii, the Philippines, Samoa, Cuba, Puerto Rico, the annexation of Mexico's territories, and deportation and repression of native Americans were all colonial power grabs - and all performed under the aegis of the Monroe Doctrine.

This is the fundamental difference between the British Empire of yesteryear, and the American empire of today. The British public was never confused as to whether or not it was at the head of a globe-spanning empire.