News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Magic Lantern by cortesoft on Monday February 18, 2019 @04:27PM (#19194622)
If they put in a good CPU and use a standard OS, they would have more trouble selling you a new camera with newer features, since you could just upgrade your old one.
Re:Magic Lantern by jrockway on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @12:31AM (#19196838)
I doubt that's why people upgrade. If you made the sensor replaceable, people would still be using digital cameras from 1996 except with the latest sensor.

I have several replaceable-sensor cameras and the bodies/lenses were made before I was born. They still take great pictures because it turns out that focusing light onto stuff is largely a solved problem. (They don't even use batteries, much less need an up-to-date OS! But I will admit that carrying a separate light meter is a little annoying.)

Yes, there will always be people that need a 1 billion point autofocus system, and that will require some heavy software engineering. That is a niche use case, even more niche than needing a digital camera to begin with.

Re:Magic Lantern by Trombone12 on Monday February 18, 2019 @05:43PM (#19195166)
Big cpu means shit battery time, and thus a shit camera. And locking into a specific hardware configuration in a field that is basically all about making hardware developments seems kind of short sighted.