News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google backtracks on Chrome modifications that would have... by londons_explore on Monday February 18, 2019 @02:55AM (#19189189)
> There is no performance hit from using webRequest like this

Citation needed. My personal experiments show that blocking webrequest has more latency than the network connection!

Re:Google backtracks on Chrome modifications that would have... by xkapastel on Monday February 18, 2019 @07:49AM (#19190278)
Did you read the article? That's what it's about. I'm actually really surprised you posted this, the whole article is about Cliqz doing a performance test and finding that the claims about ad blockers hurting performance were not true.
Re:Google backtracks on Chrome modifications that would have... by demindiro on Tuesday February 19, 2019 @05:57AM (#19198091)
I think it was sarcasm.
Re:Google backtracks on Chrome modifications that would have... by xkapastel on Tuesday February 26, 2019 @02:22PM (#19257454)
Yeah I'm not good at detecting that, especially not online where people say all sorts of weird things :)
Re:Google backtracks on Chrome modifications that would have... by zaarn on Monday February 18, 2019 @04:26AM (#19189518)
My own personal experiments show that even with huge rule lists, the latency incurred on the connection is barely above the noise and improves loading times on most websites by mulitple magnitudes more than it could increase latency.