Re:Muscle memory discovery ends 'use it or lose it' dogma
by IshKebab on Monday February 18, 2019 @04:20AM
(#19189494)
That can't be everything though because otherwise your body wouldn't physically change when you train and they clearly do.
Also why wouldn't evolution just make us all strong all the time if it only requires neurological changes?
Re:Muscle memory discovery ends 'use it or lose it' dogma
by PeterisP on Monday February 18, 2019 @10:15AM
(#19191205)
Strength is generally an evolutionary drawback, in most cases the benefits of extra strength doesn't outweigh the calorie cost of building maintaining it.
For very costly things like strength and brainpower, evolution is ensuring that we have as much as we require, and not a single bit more; and has all kinds of processes for actively reducing strength that you had unless you have both extra calories and the demonstrated need to use that strength; because it saves calories.
Re:Muscle memory discovery ends 'use it or lose it' dogma
by ashelmire on Monday February 18, 2019 @06:19AM
(#19189967)
It’s not everything. See muscle hypertrophy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_hypertrophy
Re:Muscle memory discovery ends 'use it or lose it' dogma
by adrianN on Monday February 18, 2019 @06:40AM
(#19190031)
Probably a combination of not needing to be very strong (we don't use raw strength to hunt very often) and a metabolic cost.
Re:Muscle memory discovery ends 'use it or lose it' dogma
by noir_lord on Monday February 18, 2019 @08:35AM
(#19190496)
Metabolic cost is a big factor.
It's one of the theories of why homo sapiens out competed neanderthal basically everywhere, we can survive the lean times better.
Iirc they required about twice the average intake of an anatomically modern homo sapiens.
As you train (that is, try really hard to lift something heavy), you teach your brain that you're going to be lifting heavy things a lot going forward, which makes your brain recruit more muscle fibers when you actually go ahead and lift the thing.
So you're right in one sense, and incomplete in another.