Intel Starts Publishing Open-Source Linux Driver Code for Discrete GPUs

Re:Intel Starts Publishing Open-Source Linux Driver Code for... by slezyr on Sunday February 17, 2019 @04:48AM (#19183628)

Try to use OpenCL and you will need blobs. It's major pain to use blender(requires OpenCL if you want to finish render today) not long time ago their blob crashed on new versions libdrm.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel Starts Publishing Open-Source Linux Driver Code for... by floatboth on Sunday February 17, 2019 @05:59AM (#19183828)

The blobs are probably the most stable option right now, but Clover exists (and kinda sucks) and the new cool option is the fully open ROCm stack which does include OpenCL.

> requires OpenCL if you want to finish render today

honestly, modern CPUs aren't that far behind in Cycles rendering

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel Starts Publishing Open-Source Linux Driver Code for... by greenpenguin on Sunday February 17, 2019 @09:30AM (#19184599)

I'm using RocM OpenCL right now, which I believe is the approved option, or will be. Personally I've not had any issues with it - I can certainly use Blender with it, although the performance right now is so-so (I only have a cheap APU though, so hardly surprising).

I don't believe I have any blobs, other than the firmware one, which is true regardless - can you tell me what blobs you mean?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel Starts Publishing Open-Source Linux Driver Code for... by slezyr on Sunday February 17, 2019 @09:46AM (#19184675)

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opencl-amd/

this one, part of amdgpu-pro

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel Starts Publishing Open-Source Linux Driver Code for... by greenpenguin on Sunday February 17, 2019 @09:59AM (#19184748)

I can confirm I don't have that installed. I'm using this: https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm-OpenCL-Runtime

Edit: actually Blender performance is decent, but the kernels take ~10 minutes to compile.

[ Parent | on HN ]