News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:They Thrive on All-Meat Diet (1929) by eesmith on Saturday February 16, 2019 @03:28PM (#19180750)
Why do you not believe the claim?

Do you think they were lying/cheating on the food they ate, as published in http://www.jbc.org/content/87/3/651.full.pdf ?

Do you discount the observation that "Inuit would often go 6 to 9 months a year eating nothing but meat and fish"?

Do you think the meat items mentioned in the JAMA are incomplete sources of nutrition?

Why "accidentally got required nutrition in ways similar to the Inuit"? After his many years of polar exploration and friendship with the Inuit, how can you dismiss that it was a learned practice?

Do you know of subsequent papers casting doubt on the results? Or replicating it, for that matter?

I found http://home.exetel.com.au/surreality/health/A%20Review%20of%... which says

> This level of protein intake may have been sustainable if hepatic enzymes were given time to upregulate (as there were several years between Stefansson living with the Inuit and the experiment at Bellevue Hospital and any previous upregulation of hepatic enzymes would have diminished), but the result for this limited study (where n = 1) indicates that the values shown in Table 1 are at least realistic, although we would speculate that individuals would tend to be at the lower end of the range for MRUS without a lead-in time for upregulating hepatic enzyme function.

which considers it feasible.

Re:They Thrive on All-Meat Diet (1929) by sridca on Saturday February 16, 2019 @07:45PM (#19181919)
When people say they don't believe something (despite available facts) it could also mean that those facts run contradictory to what they already believe.