News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We ignored evidence linking cigarettes to cancer – Let's ... by whalesalad on Saturday February 16, 2019 @12:24PM (#19179664)
Can you cite any sources for this? AFAIK nicotine is not too different from caffeine as far as stimulants go. It’s demonized due to cigarettes.
Re:We ignored evidence linking cigarettes to cancer – Let's ... by JauntTrooper on Saturday February 16, 2019 @12:47PM (#19179797)
Nicotine is far worse than caffeine.

It basically works as an accelerant, stimulating and encouraging tumor growth and metastasis.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915512/#S7titl...

"Nicotine, which is the addictive component of tobacco smoke, is unable to initiate tumorigenesis in humans and rodents; at the same time, nicotine has been shown to promote tumor growth and metastasis by inducing cell cycle progression, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), migration, invasion, angiogenesis, and evasion of apoptosis in a variety of systems (8–13). In addition, nicotine has been shown to induce secretion of growth factors and cytokines altering the physiology of multiple organ systems (8–13). These observations suggest that nicotine likely contributes to the progression and metastasis of tumors that are initiated by tobacco carcinogens."

Re:We ignored evidence linking cigarettes to cancer – Let's ... by code_duck on Saturday February 16, 2019 @01:06PM (#19179921)
Caffeine would be far worse for you if inhaled versus oral ingestion due to how quickly it affects your body. The same is true for cocaine or amphetamines, all of these drugs falling under the category of CNS stimulant. Oral cocaine would be far safer than the ways it is commonly used. Similarly, oral nicotine would be much safer.