News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Replacing JavaScript Hot Path with WebAssembly by eridius on Friday February 15, 2019 @02:41PM (#19174042)
"Legal concerns" is a weird excuse, but personally, I'm glad they didn't name names. The point of this article isn't to shame any browser vendors, it's to talk about WebAssembly. Naming the browsers would have just distracted from the article's topic.
Re:Replacing JavaScript Hot Path with WebAssembly by onli on Saturday February 16, 2019 @05:21AM (#19178029)
Would that be the explanation given it would be completely fine :)