News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A new book argues that violence laid the foundation for v... by pazimzadeh on Friday February 15, 2019 @12:27PM (#19172788)
I was with you 100% until you said:

> So what is happening when someone tosses out their religious context? They are essentially saying "I understand this organism perfectly, I know its strengths and weaknesses, and I know better than the process of natural selection as to what is a better way of living."

That's the opposite of what atheism (well, weak atheism, the only valid kind) says, which is: I don't know, and I don't think you do either.

The idea of having a sense of community and values that can be communicated over generations is fantastic, but it does not require superstition any more. Sometimes you need to rip the band-aid, and sometimes you need to be more gentle. But let's agree that the band-aid is coming off so that we can move on to the next step in the healing process.

> God loves you

Again, let's stick to what we know.

Oh, and let's get rid of the notion that skeptics are bad people (Psalms 14:1).

Re:A new book argues that violence laid the foundation for v... by camelNotation on Friday February 15, 2019 @02:25PM (#19173897)
>The idea of having a sense of community and values that can be communicated over generations is fantastic, but it does not require superstition any more. Sometimes you need to rip the band-aid, and sometimes you need to be more gentle. But let's agree that the band-aid is coming off so that we can move on to the next step in the healing process.

Literally just your way of saying: "I understand this organism perfectly, I know its strengths and weaknesses, and I know better than the process of natural selection as to what is a better way of living."

Cognitive dissonance is a hell of a drug.

How can you possibly ENGINEER something if you don't even know what the requirements are?