News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DConf 2019 in London by Profan on Friday February 15, 2019 @03:09AM (#19169284)
D is still miles ahead of C++ if you care about compile times, even in pathological cases (like using tons of templates and/or CTFE in your D code).
Re:DConf 2019 in London by zerr on Friday February 15, 2019 @05:31AM (#19169820)
When I hear about fast compile times, like e.g. for Pascal, immediately comes to mind - how good is optimization of the resulting executable? AFAIK, the back-end, not the front-end/parsing, takes most time when compiling C++. So in case of GCC or LLVM based D compilers, the time should be similar?
Re:DConf 2019 in London by atilaneves on Friday February 15, 2019 @06:56AM (#19170142)
> AFAIK, the back-end, not the front-end/parsing, takes most time when compiling C++

Is there a reason why you believe that to be true?

> So in case of GCC or LLVM based D compilers, the time should be similar?

They are not: https://atilanevesoncode.wordpress.com/2018/12/31/comparing-...