News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Quantum Computing, Capabilities and Limits: An Interview ... by jerf on Thursday February 14, 2019 @12:03PM (#19163484)
"if you’re doing superconducting qubits, which is maybe the most popular approach today, then at a bare minimum, you need to cool everything down to 10 mKB,"

Anyone know what that temperature is supposed to be? Googling for "mkb" doesn't come up with anything I can scrounge up. mK for milli-Kelvin doesn't make much sense, as you don't need to get that low for superconductivity in general, and that's a pretty hard temperature to reach.

Re:Quantum Computing, Capabilities and Limits: An Interview ... by liuhenry on Thursday February 14, 2019 @02:14PM (#19164899)
10 milliKelvin is the temperature range that allows the usage of commercial RF equipment in the ~5GHz range to control the qubits.

The relationship between the two is essentially Energy = k_B * temp = h * freq, where k_B is the Boltzmann constant and h is Planck's constant.

If the temperature was higher than 10 milliKelvin, then thermal fluctuations could have comparable energy to your control signals and thus cause unintended electronic state transitions.

Re:Quantum Computing, Capabilities and Limits: An Interview ... by knopyPusher on Thursday February 14, 2019 @12:17PM (#19163638)
It's not just superconductivity that you need. You also need to reduce thermal noise to maintain coherence between qubits. mill-Kelvin is the typical temperature range D-Wave computers go to [1], for instance.

In fact, when you see large mainframe-like pictures of quantum computers, the big box mostly contains cooling equipment. The actual circuitry is pretty small.

[1] https://www.dwavesys.com/tutorials/background-reading-series...

Re:Quantum Computing, Capabilities and Limits: An Interview ... by jpfed on Thursday February 14, 2019 @01:13PM (#19164260)
Well, there's a pretty cool DJ with the username "mkb" across a few different sites. Aaronson is correctly noting that any superconducting quantum computer needs to be at least ten times as cool as that guy in order to work.
Re:Quantum Computing, Capabilities and Limits: An Interview ... by Sniffnoy on Thursday February 14, 2019 @12:40PM (#19163895)
Re:Quantum Computing, Capabilities and Limits: An Interview ... by jerf on Thursday February 14, 2019 @02:49PM (#19165304)
Thank you, and thank you to the other repliers who answered. I have learned something today.
Re:Quantum Computing, Capabilities and Limits: An Interview ... by pfortuny on Thursday February 14, 2019 @12:21PM (#19163694)
I guess it may be mass times the Boltzmann constant (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_constant) BUT I HAVE NO IDEA. And maybe he is handwaving some arithmetic manipulations. (?)