Re:Activision-Blizzard layoffs after reporting record results
by CydeWeys on Tuesday February 12, 2019 @10:13PM
(#19150041)
I wonder how much "has recently had or is planning on having massive layoffs" affects employer satisfaction rates. How could Blizzard possibly be considered one of the best companies to work for next year if they just canned so many people this year? That's gotta be terrible for morale, no? I've fortunately never worked at a company that's had big layoffs (ever, not just while I've worked there), but I can imagine that even if I wasn't laid off, I'd start looking for another job, because who knows? I could be next.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Activision-Blizzard layoffs after reporting record results
by NikolaNovak on Wednesday February 13, 2019 @12:14AM
(#19150620)
reeeeallly depends.
You've asked a broad, general question - I have no knowledge of Blizzard whatsoever.
But while in many (most?) cases layoffs have negative impact on morale, it's not necessarily the case. High performing teams and individuals can have their morale boosted if they perceive that unproductive employees have been trimmed. While perhaps less common in startups, I'd venture that in large corporations, there will be team members who are perceived to not be pulling their weight or are downright drain on the team; layers of management, not to mention bureaucracy and administration, that average employees would gleefully see removed; or branches that are perceived as diluting focus of the company -- etc etc.
Re:Activision-Blizzard layoffs after reporting record results
by CydeWeys on Wednesday February 13, 2019 @10:52AM
(#19153934)
I was thinking about that, but it's hard to imagine a large lay-off being surgical enough to reliably target just the under-performers. They usually target entire under-performing product areas.