Re:The memory safety problem isn't bad coders
by lmm on Tuesday February 12, 2019 @03:10PM
(#19147040)
Types because they can be checked mechanically, simply enough that a programmer can understand the checking process and why it fails or succeeds, but are expressive enough (given some relatively cautious/widespread advances - HKT and some level of dependent typing) for every invariant I've ever needed.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.