News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Not-Paid: Client did not pay?Add opacity to body tag and ... by paulsutter on Sunday February 10, 2019 @09:02PM (#19131528)
This is a bad bad very terrible idea[1]

Better to Google "collections lawyer" and proceed from there

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act#C...

Re:Not-Paid: Client did not pay?Add opacity to body tag and ... by zzaip on Sunday February 10, 2019 @09:03PM (#19131538)
This code is... rough? I'm sorry. You're clamping opacity between 0 and 1 and then checking that it's clamped between 0 and 1. Among other issues.
Re:Not-Paid: Client did not pay?Add opacity to body tag and ... by hayksaakian on Sunday February 10, 2019 @09:01PM (#19131520)
threats like this don't make you friends.

You're better off collecting on a "deadbeat" client by enforcing the terms of your contracts in small claims court.

Re:Not-Paid: Client did not pay?Add opacity to body tag and ... by crooked-v on Sunday February 10, 2019 @08:58PM (#19131508)
This seems like a terrible idea.
Re:Not-Paid: Client did not pay?Add opacity to body tag and ... by rkho on Sunday February 10, 2019 @09:03PM (#19131536)
I find this idea amusing, but I'm terrified to even consider implementing this in fear of legal ramifications.

It's a lot better to pursue legal action than this.

Re:Not-Paid: Client did not pay?Add opacity to body tag and ... by aerovistae on Sunday February 10, 2019 @08:59PM (#19131513)
It's funny but it's not very effective.
Re:Not-Paid: Client did not pay?Add opacity to body tag and ... by rough-sea on Sunday February 10, 2019 @09:01PM (#19131518)
Clever way to advertise