News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An ex-YouTube whistleblower on their recommendation engine by dallashoxton on Sunday February 10, 2019 @02:24PM (#19129486)
100% agreed.

>(If it decreases between 1B and 10B views on such content, and if we assume one person falling for it each 100,000 views, it will prevent 10,000 to 100,000 "falls") 14/

What does this sentence even mean? It's very hard to parse to the point of being incoherent.

The fact that people have gone from writing long-form essays to "twitter threads" to argue something is tragic.

Re:An ex-YouTube whistleblower on their recommendation engine by ec109685 on Sunday February 10, 2019 @02:37PM (#19129546)
That given the number of views of this content and how likely a user will fall for it, there are a significant number of people who will not be tricked into believing something not true due to this algorithm change.