Survey: Python vs Ruby Test Ecosystems

Re:Survey: Python vs Ruby Test Ecosystems by silentbicycle on Tuesday November 16, 2010 @11:01PM (#1912849)

Ruby DSLs still look like Ruby code, too; it just has a laxer lexer. For a reality check, look at DSLs in Forth or Prolog sometime. Many Ruby DSLs are :covered with? accent "marks", though, like Romanized Vietnamese* . You're probably just used to it.

* e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cà_phê_sữa_đá

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Survey: Python vs Ruby Test Ecosystems by lusis on Tuesday November 16, 2010 @11:52PM (#1912974)

Fair enough. Sinatra and Chef are good examples of "ruby code" DSLs.

In contrast, however, I give you Cucumber scenario files. Yes, Given/When/Then are methods but it's still a very elegant DSL.

I'll do some poking into prolog and forth-based DSLs. You've peaked my interest.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Survey: Python vs Ruby Test Ecosystems by nvie on Wednesday November 17, 2010 @03:48AM (#1913506)

Cucumber is not really a native DSL. The scenario files are simply text files that are parsed (pattern matched) by Cucumber, which is a parser that's written in Ruby. It could well be written in Python, too.

If you look at Steak (https://github.com/cavalle/steak), however, this is a real native Ruby DSL, and such a thing is impossible to ever do as elegant in Python.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Survey: Python vs Ruby Test Ecosystems by cageface on Wednesday November 17, 2010 @09:04AM (#1914219)

Maybe, but my enthusiasm for DSLs in ruby has diminished a lot in the 6+ years I've been doing ruby work. DSLs don't compose well and it's usually easier to learn a new api than yet another new mini-language.

[ Parent | on HN ]