How Craig Barton wishes he’d taught maths

Re:How Craig Barton wishes he’d taught maths by throwawaymath on Saturday February 09, 2019 @03:21PM (#19124361)

Everything you've said is true, but circling back to the example given, we still can't choose a scalar 1/n for integral n. Yes the integers are a ring, and yes you can define a module over a ring which generalizes a vector space.

But the point being spoken to here is that the explanation is backwards: you can't choose 1/n from Z. Therefore you can't use it as a scalar, so you'd never even break closure in the vector space. The hypothesis doesn't work before you can engage that contradiction.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Craig Barton wishes he’d taught maths by skh on Saturday February 09, 2019 @06:18PM (#19125341)

You are correct and I wasn't trying to criticize what you wrote. gizmo686's post (the one I responded to) indicated a sense of insight into these issues. I wanted gizmo686 to feel justified in his/her thoughts. Namely, that what we call modules are natural objects and they look at feel like vectors spaces on the surface.

[ Parent | on HN ]