the "Do you believe NYC should give 3B+ subsidies to Amazon"
Or, "Do you believe NYC giving 4 times the subsidies to Amazon, compared to D.C., is a good deal?.?
are missing. Put them into the questionnaire, and see how the response rates change.
(That's without being prompted with the specific $ amount of the subsidies, as far as I can see. If they had mentioned the $4 billion figure, the response might have been even more overwhelming.)
Also from the poll:
a majority of New York registered voters also see it as likely that Amazon’s HQ2 will increase the cost of housing in New York City and complicate public transit and transportation, among other issues.
This seems to support the parent’s general claim about the subway etc.
Did the poll ask if New Yorkers were happy with the subsidies?
The poll question: Do you approve or disapprove of Amazon locating one of its new headquarters in Long Island City in Queens? is at least vastly incomplete.
I don’t know the specifics, but it seems fair to me the question should be something more like: do you approve or disapprove of the city spending $x of taxpayers money on a deal to bring Amazon to NYC?
https://poll.qu.edu/new-york-city/release-detail?ReleaseID=2...
The questions on that survey don't mention any thing about subsidies... period.
Change it to: "Do you believe Amazon should be given 3B subsidies to come to NYC?" and the replies will look very different...
I think you meant that “nobody is asserting that a large company creating jobs, is a bad thing”
What's the point of being so condescending to people? This is not a constructive way to correct someone.
https://harrisx.com/2019/02/new-poll-shows-overwhelming-supp....
------
Other key findings from the poll include: