Re:Spotify will now suspend or terminate accounts it finds a...
by gpderetta on Friday February 08, 2019 @03:14PM
(#19118225)
Oh, I agree they can kick you out. But getting a coffee and walking away is very different from using the WiFi and walking away.
Re:Spotify will now suspend or terminate accounts it finds a...
by munk-a on Friday February 08, 2019 @06:48PM
(#19119710)
Not really, you're using a service, the cost of that service may be incidental but the classic superman/office space bank hack of diverting all the partial cents on interest to a separate account isn't legal just because each action is so small... It is different because it'd probably be silly to enforce that everyone using their wifi has paid for a drink, but there isn't a distinction there ethically or legally... Unless you think that wifi should be a free social benefit for everyone everywhere - but that particular wifi is being provided by starbucks for a cost to them.
Re:Spotify will now suspend or terminate accounts it finds a...
by gpderetta on Friday February 08, 2019 @06:51PM
(#19119728)
I just think it would be very hard to legally argue that there is any implied contract that you must buy a coffee to use the WiFi. But then again, IANAL.
Re:Spotify will now suspend or terminate accounts it finds a...
by fastball on Sunday February 10, 2019 @11:42AM
(#19128466)
There is a literal contract for Sbux wifi. You need to agree to a ToS when you join the wifi network. That ToS includes "you must be a starbucks customer".
Obviously what a "customer" entails is up for legal debate, but it generally does not include people who purchase nothing from Sbux.
(actually Starbucks does not feel at ease doing that after the whole two men / racism fiasco, but they should feel justified in doing that).