That’s been the standard since the adoption of the Constitution. If it was a slippery slope, you’d think we would have slipped down it at some point in the past 230 years.
Seems like we're always finding new precedents to set like the "nuclear option" in the Senate.
And 230yrs is pretty young for a country.
Young for a country, pretty old for the same base set of rules within that country.
The "nuclear option" is just a senate rule. It's not a law, it's not in the Constitution.
Re:No Thank You, Mr. Pecker
by coryfklein on Friday February 08, 2019 @11:56AM
(#19116142)
It's pretty damn hard to slip down a slope that requires 2/3 of the senate to agree with each other.
...by design.
Re:No Thank You, Mr. Pecker
by checkyoursudo on Friday February 08, 2019 @11:11AM
(#19115535)
Removal requires 2/3 votes of the Senate, so that seems pretty much like what you are asking for here.
If Republicans were guaranteed to keep the President and VP slot, you'd see an impeachment much more easily. I don't think any Republican will want Pelosi a heartbeat away from the Presidency unless Trump's crime was so clear and egregious that 2/3 of the country wanted him gone.