Jeff Bezos Accuses National Enquirer of Blackmail

Re:Jeff Bezos Accuses National Enquirer of Blackmail by comex on Thursday February 07, 2019 @09:32PM (#19110964)

> 15/ To make this out as an extortion case, prosecutors would have to argue that the claims Bezos had against AMI constituted "money or property" of Bezos and that the whole settlement proposal was merely window dressing for the extortion of Bezos by AMI.

I’m not sure what they’re quoting from, but the New York law I quoted is not limited to attempts to obtain “money or property”. One federal law that might otherwise apply, 18 USC § 875, does have such a limitation, though not in those terms; it requires “intent to extort from any person, firm, association, or corporation, any money or other thing of value”.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Jeff Bezos Accuses National Enquirer of Blackmail by tptacek on Thursday February 07, 2019 @09:36PM (#19110998)

Coercion is a misdemeanor.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Jeff Bezos Accuses National Enquirer of Blackmail by comex on Thursday February 07, 2019 @09:44PM (#19111046)

That is true, but felonies and misdemeanors are both considered crimes. Thus it would fit your mention of “criminal” behavior, as well as – more importantly – the clause in the non-prosecution agreement that waives it “should AMI commit any crimes”.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Jeff Bezos Accuses National Enquirer of Blackmail by thaumasiotes on Thursday February 07, 2019 @10:04PM (#19111166)

As I point out sidethread, the same behavior is a felony in Washington, and it seems pretty likely off the top of my head that a Washington court could exercise jurisdiction over a national tabloid committing a Washington state felony against a resident of Washington.

[ Parent | on HN ]