> Why not have a simple `class` construct as in JavaScript? Keeping functions together in a class is very convenient and means you don't have to pass the struct as the first argument each time.

This already seems to have a way to associate functions with data structures, in the same way that methods are done in Go, via a "receiver" before the function name

Eg.

    type Something{}
    fn (self mut Something) method() { ... }

and calling the method with an instance

    x := Something{}
    x.method()