News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CodeFlow: Improving the Code Review Process at Microsoft ... by hopler on Thursday February 07, 2019 @08:43AM (#19105115)
"edoing the UI is on the to-do list, once the migration from Angular to Vue is done."

Is what makes me uncomfortable about modern webdev. Valuable product work constantly deprioritized by migrations to new frameworks. Magpieing has always been a risk in hobby projects, but in the past there was a smaller torrent of nee things to always be migrating to.

Re:CodeFlow: Improving the Code Review Process at Microsoft ... by piotrkaminski on Thursday February 07, 2019 @02:58PM (#19107985)
Eh, I don't think it's as bad as you make it sound. It's not "constantly", it's the first major migration effort for Reviewable. And honestly, I probably could've stayed with Angular 1.x for a few more years (it's still being developed, after all), I just got tired of working around its performance issues. There's also 4 years of learning how best to architect an application like this that led to the creation of a Firebase-centric model layer where Vue happened to be a good platform to build on. And even if we didn't switch platforms, a thorough refactoring would've been necessary after many years of accumulated technical debt.
Re:CodeFlow: Improving the Code Review Process at Microsoft ... by ambulancechaser on Thursday February 07, 2019 @09:30AM (#19105394)
That doesn't seem particularly different that desktop software. Pretend s/he said that once they got to off of WinForms and onto WPF they could iterate on the UI design. or maybe once they upgraded GTK, or whatever.