News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Vast Re-Education Program of the Superbowl Ads by falcolas on Wednesday February 06, 2019 @04:30PM (#19100202)
When evaluating literature, ignoring the context of the literature strips significant meaning from the literature.
Re:The Vast Re-Education Program of the Superbowl Ads by throwawaymath on Wednesday February 06, 2019 @05:20PM (#19100685)
Literature? This is a blog post. It’s not like I’m losing a critical piece of the Superbowl advertising zeitgeist by ignoring the identity of the authors. The Superbowl is not a figurative tool to be used as the backdrop for religion in modern advertising. If this was reposted anonymously and still stood on its own, would we have to do this song and dance?

The content of this article stands on its own or it doesn’t. Ignoring it because it was written by someone with different values from your own is puerile. That was my original point.

Re:The Vast Re-Education Program of the Superbowl Ads by asdfasdfasdfa on Wednesday February 06, 2019 @09:58PM (#19102600)
I mean i was being in tongue in cheek, but it really seems like a "Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?" kind of situation.
Re:The Vast Re-Education Program of the Superbowl Ads by artificial on Wednesday February 06, 2019 @04:42PM (#19100334)
Suggesting there is bias? It's pervasive and not unique to the Church. For example this article's sampling is narrow.