Why Nasa Converted Its Lessons-Learned Database into a Knowledge Graph

Re:Why Nasa Converted Its Lessons-Learned Database into a Kn... by Timothycquinn on Wednesday February 06, 2019 @01:15PM (#19097907)

I spent a bulk of my programming career modelling business processes in a graph database with strong schema, lifecycle control (state machines) and formal change control (revisioning).

I was always blown away with how easy it was to turn around a very stable and useful system where the customers could actually understand the data model and refactoring was easy to reason through.

Graph databases FTW.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Nasa Converted Its Lessons-Learned Database into a Kn... by riku_iki on Wednesday February 06, 2019 @02:28PM (#19098841)

What tools you used for this?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Nasa Converted Its Lessons-Learned Database into a Kn... by Timothycquinn on Wednesday February 06, 2019 @05:36PM (#19100831)

It's not commercially available unfortunately when I last checked. You have to buy business software and licences to get access to the DB kernel and api's. The main product is called Enovia, formerly called eMatrix by matrix one. Dassault Systemes in France.

Would be sweet to have a similar system in FOSS middleware on top of Neo4J or OrientDB.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Nasa Converted Its Lessons-Learned Database into a Kn... by Timothycquinn on Wednesday February 06, 2019 @09:01PM (#19102263)

[update] Dassault Systemes purchased Matrix One about 10 years ago. They still use their Graph based DB kernel in many of their products. From my understanding, this DB kernel was written in the early 90's and targeted PDM (Product Data Mangement). They now target a broader category of PLM (Product Lifecycle Management). Again, there is no way to purchase their Graph DB Kernel last time I checked which is a shame because its so awesome to develop with :(

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Nasa Converted Its Lessons-Learned Database into a Kn... by Timothycquinn on Wednesday February 06, 2019 @09:08PM (#19102301)

[more info] Some notable customers of Enovia (eMatrix): Boeing, Honeywell, Tesla, Bombardier, Airbus.

Disclaimer: I don't work presently work for Dassault. I just really like their DB kernel ;)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Nasa Converted Its Lessons-Learned Database into a Kn... by Jeff_Brown on Wednesday February 06, 2019 @03:27PM (#19099500)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Nasa Converted Its Lessons-Learned Database into a Kn... by flyingsilverfin on Thursday February 07, 2019 @08:54AM (#19105189)

Grakn (Grakn.ai) offers a strongly typed graph database that is open source :) (disclaimer: work there)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Nasa Converted Its Lessons-Learned Database into a Kn... by Timothycquinn on Friday February 08, 2019 @09:14PM (#19120274)

Took a look. Interesting project. The abstraction model available to declaring relationships/vertices was hard to grasp at first glance but as I thought about it further, I can see some interesting benefits for pattern matching grammar. eMatrix did not have abstraction for relationships/vertices types but did for object/edge types.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Nasa Converted Its Lessons-Learned Database into a Kn... by Timothycquinn on Thursday February 07, 2019 @05:18PM (#19109164)

Thanks. I'll take a look :)

[ Parent | on HN ]