News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backtracks on one-year ... by munk-a on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @07:25PM (#19091514)
> We value individuality foremost and I believe its among the top reasons parental leave is incomprehensible to many people.

Uh... that's not valuing the individual (or individuality, the ability to make choices freely for one's self). The lack of paid parental leave adds an outside a government mandated influence to the decision of whether to have children or not.

Unless... you're talking about the individual rights of the corporation to not have to pay parental leave, through some twisted extension of citizen's united. As a society it benefits us to encourage people to have children, so making the process even more difficult is a bit silly.

Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backtracks on one-year ... by int_19h on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @08:01PM (#19091732)
You don't have to be a corporation to hire people - think sole proprietorship.

I've been thinking that it might be an interesting experiment to apply some of the restrictions that we have only to corporations, but allow more leeway to individuals. So e.g. if you're a sole proprietor, you can arbitrarily discriminate in employment or service (it's your personal freedom of association), but if you register as an LLC, then that comes with the usual strings attached (since an artificial entity doesn't have proper personhood and any rights associated with that).

I suspect most businesses, even small, would still be LLCs.

Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backtracks on one-year ... by bluecalm on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @08:50PM (#19091982)
Parental leave as currently implemented in European countries incentivize having children later in life which is happening resulting in less children overall. There is absolutely no reason employers should be burdened by parental leave. If we as a society decide we want to support parents let's collect enough taxes and have the government pay. If the support is independent of your job status and salary it will remove twisted incentive to wait till your 30s do have children (which is the case when benefits are based on your current salary).
Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backtracks on one-year ... by Symbiote on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @09:56PM (#19092306)
Do you have any source for that?

My parental leave entitlement has been the same since my first job after graduation at 22.

Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backtracks on one-year ... by bluecalm on Wednesday February 06, 2019 @02:20AM (#19093357)
What country? Here it is percentage of your pay (or more precisely it's based on how much social insurance you paid last month and this is based on your current pay). I am under impression it's implemented that way in all of Europe.
Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backtracks on one-year ... by Symbiote on Wednesday February 06, 2019 @07:58AM (#19094727)
You should correct your impressions.

You have made about 23 comments in this discussion, many regarding "your country", but you haven't stated it once. You've then generalised across all of the EU based on the one country.