News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backtracks on one-year ... by dwild on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @05:57PM (#19090911)
So you are saying that you have a higher chance that a young woman will carry a baby than having a young man change for a better paying offer?

I'm one of theses young one out of college and I can tell you, based around me, your stats are clearly wrong ;). Most don't care about babies, but they all certainly care about getting more interesting jobs. I'm Canadian too.

Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backtracks on one-year ... by pbhjpbhj on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @06:26PM (#19091164)
>a higher chance that a young woman will carry a baby than having a young man change for a better paying offer? //

Well surely the woman has all the possibilities the man has (eg changing to a better offer), plus they have the possibility of maternity, logically speaking. I'm considering maternity as a separate issue to child-rearing FWIW.

Quantitatively maternity probably dwarfs the male majority issues (for leaving the work force) such as suicide.

>Most don't care about babies, //

The proportion of humans who don't have basic biological urges associated with reproduction is approximately zero. A more telling statistic is probably "Of those born in 1971, 18 per cent were childless in 2016, when they turned 45." [1]. In the same article the average number of children a woman has by her 30th year is 1.0 in the UK.

[1] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11/24/proportion-women...

Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backtracks on one-year ... by bluecalm on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @06:11PM (#19091044)
If someone leaves I can find a replacement and hope they don't leave. If a women has a baby then I will either need to hire a temp which is more difficult than to hire for full time position or suddenly have 2 positions open (I need to have that when my first employee comes back). For a small few people company having 2 positions open instead of one is often unreasonable cost.
Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backtracks on one-year ... by maxsilver on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @06:15PM (#19091069)
> I will either need to hire a temp which is more difficult than to hire for full time position

We're still talking about programmers, right? Because it is way easier to hire a part-time contract programmer, than it is to hire a full-time programmer. If anything, the best devs are often already freelancing/consulting anyway, and would prefer you hire them this way.

Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backtracks on one-year ... by wvenable on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @06:22PM (#19091125)
I had to hire a temp for a one year maternity leave replacement. It wasn't particularly difficult and the person I hired didn't want a longer contract and she is great. In fact, I kept her on as-needed contract basis after. She will be helping me smooth other the transition of another employee who just left for a better paying job.
Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backtracks on one-year ... by smileysteve on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @10:01PM (#19092328)
If, in a year, you don't have room to grow your staff by 1, haven't you already failed?
Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backtracks on one-year ... by wvenable on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @08:30PM (#19091883)
Canada also has paternity leave; and parents can split the leave in any number of different ways as long as it adds up to a year. And yes, men do take advantage of that benefit as well.