News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Eric Schmidt: “It Is A War For Talent” by olivolive on Monday November 15, 2010 @10:58PM (#1908982)
I also get e-mails every 6 months from Google.

A few years ago Google required a 3.75 or higher college GPA. That is an amazing GPA for the college I went to, so I've never applied. I wonder if they have relaxed that criteria.

Re:Eric Schmidt: “It Is A War For Talent” by iloveyouocean on Tuesday November 16, 2010 @02:41AM (#1909419)
'In my dressing room, I don't want any brown M&Ms!'

When you are perceived to be a rock star, people are willing to accommodate even seemingly non-sensical requests. Google wants a 3.75+ GPA, thats what they get. Google wants XYZ cert, thats what they get. Google take 5 months to hire you, so be it. It may piss people off individually, but as long as there is a steady stream of applicants, it doesn't immediately impact Google.

Of course the more truly talented, qualified people they dick around with and piss off, the more their reputation begins to slide from 'the best' to 'eccentric' to 'ridiculous'. I think Google is now experiencing some repurcussions that to them seems like a 'talent war'.

Re:Eric Schmidt: “It Is A War For Talent” by cvg on Monday November 15, 2010 @11:15PM (#1909006)
There is some flexibility, but they are strict. Strict in weird ways. I'm actually a former Googler who can't get back in because my GPA. Go figure! :-/
Re:Eric Schmidt: “It Is A War For Talent” by mikebo on Monday November 15, 2010 @11:50PM (#1909078)
This makes no sense. Surely Google believes GPA is a good predictor of performance, but isn't on the job performance the ultimate measurement? How long did you work there?
Re:Eric Schmidt: “It Is A War For Talent” by cvg on Tuesday November 16, 2010 @01:39AM (#1909313)
Really boggles my mind, but I think it has to do with how the recruiters get rated. I imagine the lower the percentage of successful applicants, the lower their performance.

I worked there a bit over two years.

Re:Eric Schmidt: “It Is A War For Talent” by crux_ on Tuesday November 16, 2010 @12:05AM (#1909125)
In retrospect, my college GPA of 3.1415 doesn't seem so smart. =)

(Note: I didn't hit it exactly; it was a while ago but I think I recall I ended up at 3.139.)

Re:Eric Schmidt: “It Is A War For Talent” by enjo on Tuesday November 16, 2010 @01:55AM (#1909346)
Better than my college GPA of did not finish:) I had a 3-something when I left...except that I didn't take a final or two that last semester (weather was really nice).

I think the GPA thing at Google is just stupidly silly. I've accomplished quite a bit in my career. Thankfully I don't really need Google, but it does drive me nuts that there is a place that I can't work:)

Re:Eric Schmidt: “It Is A War For Talent” by btilly on Tuesday November 16, 2010 @02:01AM (#1909357)
I personally know a number of people working at Google who not only didn't maintain that kind of GPA, they didn't graduate at all.

GPA is only useful as a filter for people just out of college. If you've been in the work force for a while, there are better measures available.

Re:Eric Schmidt: “It Is A War For Talent” by mkramlich on Tuesday November 16, 2010 @02:44AM (#1909427)
I think if someone can achieve a GPA that is equal to Pi out to 5+ significant digits then Google should hire them instantly. :)
Re:Eric Schmidt: “It Is A War For Talent” by masterj on Tuesday November 16, 2010 @02:39AM (#1909414)
3.1421 here :) That was a happy accident. At least it wasn't approaching e.
Re:Eric Schmidt: “It Is A War For Talent” by procrastitron on Tuesday November 16, 2010 @10:47AM (#1910428)
What makes you think they had that requirement? At least their current job listings don't mention anything like that (http://www.google.com/intl/en/jobs/uslocations/mountain-view...).

My suggestion would be that if you want to join Google then just send them your resume. Let them decide whether or not they want you rather than deciding that for them.