Article 13 Is Back On: Worse, Not Better

Re:Article 13 Is Back On: Worse, Not Better by StavrosK on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @08:16AM (#19084968)

Since this is driven by the entertainment industry, a solution would be to just stop consuming entertainment. They've been fucking with copyright long enough trying to get their old business models to stop failing, why are we still giving them money?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Article 13 Is Back On: Worse, Not Better by deogeo on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @09:14AM (#19085413)

People need to realize this - every cent you give to the copyright industry will be used against you.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Article 13 Is Back On: Worse, Not Better by kiba on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @09:50AM (#19085707)

Everything is copyrighted by default?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Article 13 Is Back On: Worse, Not Better by deogeo on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @09:58AM (#19085796)

But not all copyright holders lobby for such laws.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Article 13 Is Back On: Worse, Not Better by dmitriid on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @11:00AM (#19086502)

Those copyright holders who don't lobby for this often represent 1% of 1% of content, as is the case in music, for example.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Article 13 Is Back On: Worse, Not Better by Semaphor on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @08:42AM (#19085151)

I stopped buying music from any artists whose label is a member of RIAA or IFPI many years ago.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Article 13 Is Back On: Worse, Not Better by jandrese on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @12:52PM (#19087642)

Which labels are not members? I wasn't aware there were any.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Article 13 Is Back On: Worse, Not Better by Semaphor on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @02:46PM (#19089014)

Small labels. All kinds of niche music is not affiliated with the big associations. Ketzer Records is one, for example. That's one from the metal subgenre (Black/Pagan, Death, Doom, Ambient). I assume all niches have their own small labels.

[ Parent | on HN ]