Re:Stop Reading News (2013)
by PaulRobinson on Tuesday February 05, 2019 @06:47AM
(#19084454)
I don't think you need to read the Economist cover to cover to get value from it.
Generally when I buy a copy, it goes something like this:
- News in brief at the front
- Feature articles that I particularly like the sound of
- Then I go through it skimming and stopping when something catches my eye based on how much time I have
Getting the digital version also means you don't feel the pang of the dead tree sat there making you guilty, too.
I am an Economist subscriber and just download the audio edition each week. I listen to it when doing other tasks that don't require 100% mental focus such as housework and am usually able to complete each week's issue before the next one releases. I am not absorbing the content as well as if I were to sit down and read each issue, but this is a reasonable tradeoff for me.
They also have an android/iphone app for subscribers, but I've had a lot of issues with playing audio through it and find it much easier to simply download each week's .zip file of .mp3's and play them with my audio player of choice.
It is hard to find time to read The Economist from cover to cover. I try to at least look at each article, and read at least half of them. Even The Economist has some articles that seem ephemeral: for example, a discussion of whether a particular merger will or won't happen.
The same could be said of keeping up with the front page of HN. I imagine most of us pick and choose which items to give attention to.
I have had their subscription twice and the only real complaint for me would be, as you also touch upon, that they almost seem to come too often. If only they had a cheaper "digital only" subscription.
I also subscribe to https://lwn.net which brings up another thing -- supporting the organizations that make the news is important if you want news that is good (even if it's irrelevant right now) from being produced.