Yes, although there is a saying that "every generator is an iterator, but not every iterator is a generator". But then again generator has a bunch of methods (close, gi_frame, gi_yieldfrom, throw, gi_code, gi_running, send) that iterators don't have... I really don't know if <iter> is correct enough here, or should I use <genr> (that I don't use anywhere else and could be confusing).

I would've written:

<iter> = ( f(i) for i in <gen>)

where f() is some function of i.