Re:WebAssembly Troubles Part 1: WebAssembly Is Not a Stack M...
by dragonwriter on Monday February 04, 2019 @09:25AM
(#19076545)
> > Not only that, but for the most part the WebAssembly specification team were flying blind.
> It's an ad hominem.
Er, no, it's not. It's not a an attack on the designers as bad people, nor does it serve the role in an argument it would need to serve to be part of an ad hominem argument even if it was.
It may be inaccurate, misleading, , deceptive, uninformed, or a million other kinds of wrong, but it's not ad hominem.
> It's an ad hominem.
Er, no, it's not. It's not a an attack on the designers as bad people, nor does it serve the role in an argument it would need to serve to be part of an ad hominem argument even if it was.
It may be inaccurate, misleading, , deceptive, uninformed, or a million other kinds of wrong, but it's not ad hominem.