Re:One of the Biggest At-Home DNA Testing Companies Is Worki...
by carbocation on Friday February 01, 2019 @06:52PM
(#19059928)
And in case this sounds implausible, a corrupt lab tech handled 60,000 cases in MA:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/annie-dookhan-chemist-at-mass-c...
Consider a public bathroom: how much DNA is at that location? How much is relevant to the event?
Consider a corrupt lab tech: The DNA at the event might be reported as DNA from their database. Does a defense attorney get to see the untainted sample?
Consider a corrupt/hacked DNA database: The database might report that the DNA belongs to one individual when it actually doesn't. Does a defense attorney even get to see the source code?
In these scenarios, the link to any individual is either of little consequence, or fraudulent.