Some people will pay extra for car storage, other people will opt for the discount of not owning a car.
Disclaimer: I was never a regular in any big-equipment sports.
If I'm wrong, well, like I said owning a car might still be fairly popular when they self-drive.
This doesn't sound like abuse, it sounds like a good idea.
The point of expensive parking is to reduce the contention for parking spaces. If the car drives a long way away to park where parking is less contested, that seems like a win.
Neither I nor Walmart would be pleased to have empty cars showing up to park on our property.
I had in mind just the side of a road that doesn't have parking restrictions. Anybody is allowed to park there.
Perhaps you are talking about a free car park outside a supermarket or similar? In which case, yeah, fair enough, that would be abusing the free parking.
It's a bit like the complaints about Waze sending cars down minor little suburban streets. The town hadn't intended to be paying for the transportation infrastructure of a nearby major city.
Another option is to have the car drive out into the suburbs in search of free parking to abuse.
For a family, the car would drive home to be available for other users. Each trip thus turns into two trips, one to drop a person off and another to pick a person up.
The ride service model doesn't work except for the people already tolerating ride services. Lots of us want to keep our junk in our cars. We haul around our snacks, spare shoes, and raingear. Our cars might get dirty, but at least it's our own filth, not a puddle of a stranger's vomit.