If you can’t see the distinction, I doubt you will find any journalism stooping to your level.
One example would that the BBC now has to have a 50-50 gender split for experts brought onto its flagship Radio 4 Today programme. That was decided to presumably to broaden opinions given to be more inclusive.
Another example would be this speach by Ms White where she clearly states:
"So today we have announced that the BBC will have to agree with Ofcom a new Diversity Code of Practice. This will set out how the BBC will commission programmes that authentically portray the whole UK population." [1]
As to "stooping to my level", I've so far not said anything about whether this process is good or bad or if the ends justify the means. Just that it is going on and you can read about the details if you wish.
[1] https://www.ofcom.org.uk/about-ofcom/latest/media/speeches/2...
Nowhere above has OFCOM directed the BBC to air different opinions. Regarding the Today programme example: Deliberately featuring a female (rather than male) climate science expert after featuring a male vaccination expert is entirely orthogonal to impartiality.
[EDIT:] I'm not specifically arguing that the BBC has no bias. I'm saying you haven't demonstrated that OFCOM have demanded a bias.
Here is a report from OFCOM itself about a talk given by Ms White on the subject of diversity and how OFCOM can support a “positive change” agenda. [1]
Here are details of Project Diamond a programme to enforce and monitor Ms White’s diversity agenda across the industry [2]
Also [3] where Ms White speaks about punishing the BBC for not meeting her requested standards.
[1] https://www.ofcom.org.uk/about-ofcom/latest/media/speeches/2...
[2] http://creativediversitynetwork.com/diamond/
[3] https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/sep/27/tv-industry-di...