News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple blocks Google from running its internal iOS apps by gojomo on Thursday January 31, 2019 @06:38PM (#19050174)
That's false: minors can enter a contract with parental permission, and some of the coverage has Facebook saying they had parental permission for all underage participants.

But further, even if it was a violation if minors were involved, that'd leave open the question of whether use by contracted adults was compliant under the terms. (And supposedly the Google app wasn't offered to minors.)

And, paid research subjects meet the legal definition of contractor, as outlined here or elsewhere:

https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=939

Simply insisting "definitely not true" is not convincing.

Re:Apple blocks Google from running its internal iOS apps by eganist on Thursday January 31, 2019 @06:44PM (#19050215)
Oof.

In this case, it's likely (IANAL, nor are you) that each individual user of the service would be described as a vendor selling access to their data. The data itself is not created for Google's (or Facebook's in that previous case) consumption. The users of the service were selling rights and were not producing anything for hire.

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-a-vendo...

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/248665/contracto...

---

This is becoming tedious. I'm out.