Re:U.S. Changes Visa Process for High-Skilled Workers
by hippich on Thursday January 31, 2019 @01:58PM
(#19047619)
Anecdotally, whenever I post something about my business on social media, it is mostly ignored. But if someone posted something about new job they got - it is celebrated. So I see there is also social attitude supporting employment over self-employment. Not sure if it was the same in 1948.
Re:U.S. Changes Visa Process for High-Skilled Workers
by geggam on Thursday January 31, 2019 @05:40AM
(#19043847)
Regulation has killed small business.
Re:U.S. Changes Visa Process for High-Skilled Workers
by lotsofpulp on Thursday January 31, 2019 @09:41AM
(#19044987)
Efficiencies of scale killed small business. People had the choice of patronizing small business or large business, and they chose the latter.
Re:U.S. Changes Visa Process for High-Skilled Workers
by clarkevans on Thursday January 31, 2019 @10:16AM
(#19045260)
Lack of capital investment killed small businesses. Everyone now has to pay a tax penalty to take your earned capital and invest it into local main-street businesses. This capital instead, though 401k, goes into trans-national firms.
Re:U.S. Changes Visa Process for High-Skilled Workers
by jblwps on Thursday January 31, 2019 @12:45PM
(#19046800)
I think that the lack of capital investment you're describing can be thought of as a particular instance of the economy of scale (at least, broadly construed): larger and/or conglomerated companies, prima facie, have to depend less on capital injections.
Re:U.S. Changes Visa Process for High-Skilled Workers
by clmckinley on Thursday January 31, 2019 @04:46PM
(#19049201)
i cannot upvote this enough. The regulation has very little if anything to do with the closure of the vast majority of small businesses. Access to larger/more efficient companies that provide better service to cost has killed the demand for the services that small businesses provide.
We had large numbers of mostly independent economic centers populated with local businesses owned and operated by local individuals. In many ways it's something akin to what you can find in many parts of the developing world today. And it's awesome. But as the economy 'globalized' we've reached a point such that an urban business streetscape in California can very often look effectively identical, in terms of businesses in operation, to one all the way on the other side of the country in New York. You're never going to have anything even vaguely resembling economic equality when a handful of companies control immense amounts of the entire economy.
This also distorts governmental systems since extensive wealth means the reach of companies is practically unlimited. Civil servant versus a company sitting on billions of dollars with international connections spanning the entire globe and the best legal and public relations teams that money can buy? That's not even David vs Goliath, that's ant vs foot.
[1] - https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS12027714