Re:Boeing 787 Suffers Rare Dual Engine Failure on Landing
by detaro on Wednesday January 30, 2019 @12:38PM
(#19037250)
on flight before the crash. After which it was repaired, and sent on the fatal flight.
Re:Boeing 787 Suffers Rare Dual Engine Failure on Landing
by DuskStar on Wednesday January 30, 2019 @02:46PM
(#19038624)
It was also repaired before the previous flight.
It goes like this:
several flights report problem
maintenance "fixes" the problem
next flight reports that another, worse problem has appeared - bad enough that regulators have now said that the plane was "not airworthy" during this flight
maintenance "fixes" the problem
final flight impacts ocean at high speed
Your assertion is that since maintenance cleared the plane after the second fix, the plane must have been fine. To that, I point to the previous time maintenance cleared the plane, when it was demonstrably not fine.
Re:Boeing 787 Suffers Rare Dual Engine Failure on Landing
by detaro on Wednesday January 30, 2019 @05:28PM
(#19040272)
No, my claim merely was that the quote does not make the claim about the specific flight (although I didn't word it quite clearly). The findings about bad maintenance culture certainly suggest that the plane wasn't fixed properly.
Re:Boeing 787 Suffers Rare Dual Engine Failure on Landing
by Someone1234 on Wednesday January 30, 2019 @12:38PM
(#19037253)
Indeed, in a completely different flight than the one we're discussing.
> "On 28 November, Indonesia investigators said the Lion Air jet was not airworthy on flight before crash."
"not airworthy" means that it was unsafe.