Even more importantly, BitWarden has passed a third party security audit and published its results: https://blog.bitwarden.com/bitwarden-completes-third-party-s...

Not trying to bash OormiPass, but other commentators are already finding concerning security issues like a non-secure random.

requires mssql if you want to self host... Meh, keepassx still better.

Check out bitwarden_rs for an alternative backend that's easier to host.

While keepassx is a great tool, Bitwarden is a much more capable product which solves many more use cases than the single device/single user one.

Yes, the dependency on mssql is a bummer, but it is freely available and is a robust db system. And, as other have pointed out, there are alternate backends you can run if you want to forego support from the vendor.

While I can believe that multi-user with Keepass would be problematic to say the least, multi-device is not. I've been using it for years with several devices syncing via my own NextCloud instance.

nobody should ever try to make a thing if a thing that does the same thing already exists!

They should try, but maybe if they make the most common RNG mistakes they aren't suited for reinventing this particular wheel. There are many issues with the RNG and cryptography methods if you read the other comments.